Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41505298›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Historic Real-World Outcomes and Future Benchmarks for Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving First- and Second-Line Therapy in Austria - a Large Single-Center Experience.

Michael Leisch, Dominik Kiem, Christoph Grabmer, Anton Kugler, Gianfranco Pocobelli, Mayer Marie-Christina, Bernd Schöpf, Alexander Egle, Richard Greil, Thomas Melchardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael LeischThird Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.
Dominik KiemThird Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8204-0334
Christoph GrabmerDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.
Anton KuglerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Gianfranco PocobelliSalzburg Cancer Research Institute, Salzburg, Austria.
Mayer Marie-ChristinaThird Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.
Bernd SchöpfKite, a Gilead Company, Santa Monica, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0485-1462
Alexander EgleThird Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.
Richard GreilThird Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.
Thomas MelchardtThird Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of non-Hodgkin-lymphoma. Although it can be cured in many patients, a significant proportion of patients fail the primary treatment and require second-line treatment. Currently, only limited data on real-world outcomes with standard therapies in Austrian patients with DLBCL are available, and while novel therapies are emerging, no historical benchmarks have been established to serve as a reference for these novel treatments.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with DLBCL diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 who had been treated with standard therapies. To establish efficacy benchmarks for novel therapies, we applied both clinical-trial and real-world-derived criteria to analyze the outcomes of patients potentially eligible for novel or future treatments.ResultsAlthough many patients can be cured with frontline therapy, outcomes are poor, especially in high-risk patients. Patients failing frontline therapy, especially those fulfilling the chimeric antigen-receptor (CAR) T-cell eligibility criteria, had dismal outcomes, and very few patients achieved long-term remission. Our data provide benchmark outcomes for patients eligible for novel treatments such as antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC) or CAR T-cell therapy-based treatments for potential future comparative analyses.ConclusionsPatients with DLBCL treated in Austria showed comparable outcomes to those reported in other real-world studies. Overall, standard chemotherapy-based approaches provide unsatisfactory outcomes in high-risk patients and patients in whom frontline therapy fails. Because many patients are now eligible for alternative first- and second-line treatments, such as ADC-based or CAR T-cell therapy, our efficacy benchmarks can serve for the future evaluation of these therapies in the Austrian healthcare environment.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustriaBenchmarkingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomechimeric antigen receptor T-cellsdiffuse large B-cell lymphomahistorical cohortreal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID41505298
PMCPMC12783576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.