ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2026
Detecting expertise in decision making under pressure: a virtual reality assessment environment and empirical evaluation.
Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Professions such as military, aviation, submarine operation, and emergency response require individuals to navigate complex environments characterized by limited information, stringent time constraints, and significant pressures. Effective decision making under pressure is crucial in safety-critical professions, yet measuring this expertise remains challenging. Inspired by the military context, this article introduces the virtual reality decision-making expertise (VR-DMX) environment, designed to evaluate decision-making expertise under time constraints within a virtual reality scenario. VR-DMX simulates an amusement arcade where users must decide how to allocate time across various games to maximize ticket earnings. Through two validation studies (N = 60 and N = 76), we examined two metrics: Total Tickets (measuring overall performance) and DMX score (isolating decision-making quality). Both metrics demonstrated symmetrical distributions without floor or ceiling effects, with coefficients of variation comparable to established individual difference measures (32.4-37.4% for Total Tickets; 20.8-27.6% for DMX score). The moderate correlation between metrics (meta-analysis r = 0.771, 95% CI [0.599, 0.943]) indicates they measure related but distinct constructs. Our findings indicate that VR-DMX effectively differentiates individual performance levels and captures a distinct decision-making component that is separate from general cognitive abilities. Comparing decision-making expertise between professionals in safety-critical fields with those without such experience would be a sensible next step to help validate the potential for selection and training applications. VR-DMX was designed to measure decision-making expertise in safety-critical contexts, and initial validation data demonstrating effective differentiation of individual performance levels suggest that continued development could fulfill this design intention for applications in selection, training, and performance prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.