ArticleLa Radiologia medica2026
Segmental versus subsegmental transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for small (< 3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Less selective, more effective? A propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare segmental (s-) and subsegmental (ss-) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in terms of early complete response (CR), local tumor progression (LTP) and impact on hepatic function (ALBI score). MATERIALS AND
methodsA single-center retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent s-TACE or ss-TACE as exclusive treatment for small (< 3 cm) HCC between 2021 and 2023. The primary endpoints were 1-month CR and LTP rate during follow-up. The effect of the treatments on hepatic function, as assessed by the ALBI score, was analyzed as a secondary endpoint. Propensity score matching (PSM), based on both baseline and procedural data, was applied to minimize selection bias.
resultsEighty-nine patients with a total of 114 lesions were enrolled in a per-lesion analysis. No significant differences were found in terms of 1-month CR (74% vs.83%, p = 0.24). Twenty-five transplanted patients were censored at the date of transplantation. During a median follow-up of 16 months (range 7-28 months), ssTACE showed a significantly higher LTP rate compared to sTACE (38% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.001). The results were confirmed after applying PSM, with a hazard ratio of 4 (95% CI, 2-10) for LTP in the ssTACE group. The median time to LTP was similar for both groups (6.7 months vs. 5.6 months, p = 0.92). No differences were observed regarding the worsening of liver function.
conclusionsDespite similar early CR rates, ssTACE showed a significantly higher LTP rate compared to sTACE, with no significant differences in liver function deterioration between the two approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41505040What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.