ArticleAnimal cognition2026
The effect of familiarity and dog's body size on female owners' dog-directed communication.
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exaggerated prosody directed toward dogs has multiple functions, including attention getting and maintaining as well as expressing positive emotions toward the canine partner. However, the role of prosody in owner-dog familiarity remains unclear. To address this gap, we examined the effect of familiarity on the acoustic and visual prosodic features of dog-directed speech. To this end, we analyzed the prosodic features of female speakers when interacting with their own dogs vs. an unfamiliar dog of the same breed during three different situations: Attention-getting, Task-solving, and Nursery rhymes. Interestingly, only the mean pitch was affected by familiarity as speakers used a higher pitch when interacting with the unfamiliar dog compared to their own dog. Meanwhile, pitch range and the intensity of ‘happy’ facial expressions were affected by the dog’s size: speakers used a wider pitch range and more intense ‘happy’ expressions when interacting with smaller dogs. The Nursery rhymes situation evoked the most intense visual prosody, perhaps due to the use of nursery rhymes when interacting with infants. Our results suggest that a heightened overall pitch may serve as a way to appear friendly toward an unfamiliar being, acting as a universal engaging mechanism in human-dog communication. In contrast, the ‘happy’ facial expression and pitch range seem to be less sensitive to the familiarity with a dog, being more influenced by the specific situation and size of the canine partner which is likely related to the ‘cuteness factor’ and/or the baby schema in female speakers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.