Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41504941›Full record

ReviewBiodegradation2026

Recent advances in nanoadsorbents for the efficient removal of nickel ions from aqueous solutions.

Sana Shafiq, Ahmed B M Ibrahim, Waqar Uddin, Mohamed A Habib, Mudassir Iqbal, Fawad Ahmad

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biodegradation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sana ShafiqChemistry Department, University of Wah, Quaid Avenue, Wah Cantt 47040, Punjab, Pakistan.
Ahmed B M IbrahimDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), 11623, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Waqar UddinDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bahria University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mohamed A HabibDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), 11623, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mudassir IqbalSchool of Natural Sciences, National University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan. mudassir.iqbal@sns.nust.edu.pk.
Fawad AhmadChemistry Department, University of Wah, Quaid Avenue, Wah Cantt 47040, Punjab, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nickel is a toxic and carcinogenic metal, and its existence in water bodies is a major hazard to human and environmental health. Sludge production, high operating costs, and low efficiency at low metal concentrations are some of the shortcomings of conventional nickel elimination treatment strategies like chemical precipitation, ion exchange, and membrane filtration. Nanotechnology effectively removed nickel ions from water. The use of nanotechnology offers an effective route toward the removal of nickel ions (Ni

Indexed as

NanostructuresNickelWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationAdsorptionKineticsNanotechnologyNickelWater Pollutants, ChemicalNanotechnology and environmental remediationNickel ionsToxicityWastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID41504941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.