Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41504816›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026

Can teachers hear clearly? Investigating speech intelligibility and noise sensitivity in the classroom.

Belde Culhaoglu, Tugce Gul Caglar, Seyra Erbek

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Belde CulhaogluDepartment of Audiology, Faculty ofHealth Sciences, Lokman Hekim University, 2179. sok. B Blok Söğütözü, Ankara, Turkey. culhaoglubelde@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8121-8543
Tugce Gul CaglarDepartment of Audiology, Faculty ofHealth Sciences, Lokman Hekim University, 2179. sok. B Blok Söğütözü, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6599-0920
Seyra ErbekDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Lokman Hekim University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8453-6069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNoise-induced hearing loss has the highest risk level among occupational hearing loss. One of the professions exposed to occupational noise is teachers.

aimsOur aim in this study was to evaluate speech intelligibility in noise and sensitivity to noise in teachers with normal hearing.

methodsOur study included 37 teachers and 37 healthy individuals from different professional groups, aged between 25 and 60, who were not diagnosed with hearing loss. All individuals included in the study administered a form including demographic characteristics, the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT), and the Weinstein Noise Sensitivity Scale by a single practitioner in a quiet room.

resultsComparing the speech in the Hearing in Noise Test and the Weinstein Noise Sensitivity Scale between the two groups, a statistically significant difference was found in the HINT and the WNSS scores of the teachers compared to the control group (p<0.05).

conclusionWhen the HINT test and noise sensitivities of teachers and individuals from other professional groups were evaluated, it was determined that although teachers have normal hearing, they have difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments and are sensitive to noise. Teachers’ working environments should be arranged, and studies should be carried out for hearing health to reduce their professional effects.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, Noise-InducedNoise, OccupationalOccupational DiseasesSchool TeachersSpeech IntelligibilityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoiseHearing in noise testNoiseOccupational hearing lossTeacherWeinstein noise sensitivity scale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.