ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Detection of intestinal parasites from feces of captive ophidians in Mexico.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ophidians host a wide range of pathogens, including many parasite species, some of which may be of public health concern because they can infect other animal species and humans. Herpetariums house snakes in captivity as part of ex-situ conservation initiatives aimed at preserving threatened species. However, stress, immunosuppression, and limited space increase the risk of parasitic infections, including zoonotic diseases. Here, we detect the presence of intestinal parasites in ophidian species housed under conditions of captivity. Twenty specimens representing sixteen species were examined using Teuscher's coproparasitological technique, which combines sedimentation and flotation for enhanced sensitivity. All snakes tested positive for at least one parasite species. Five taxa were identified: Oxyurid nematodes (Oxyurida) (50%), Isospora sp. (45%), Cryptosporidium sp. and Ophidascaris sp. (25% each), and Aspiculuris sp. (15%). Oxyurid sp. and Isospora sp. were the most prevalent parasite species, likely due to their direct life cycles. Although less frequent, Cryptosporidium sp. poses a significant health risk due to its potential morbidity in snakes. The presence of Aspiculuris, a parasite commonly found in rodents, suggests contamination from infected prey. These discoveries highlight the importance of implementing preventive veterinary care, routine parasitological monitoring, and improved biosecurity and feeding practices in captive snake populations. Finally, this study provides valuable data on parasite diversity in Mexican ophidians under human care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41504806What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.