GuidelineMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2026
[Animal-assisted interventions (AAI) in intensive care : Position of the German Society for Internal Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine].
Guideline in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing humanized care in French ICUs: the potential benefit of welcoming pet visitors.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal-assisted interventions (AAI) are increasingly recognized as nonpharmacological adjuncts to intensive care medicine. The aim of this paper by the German Society of Internal Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DGIIN) is to summarize the scientific rationale, safety considerations, and implementation recommendations for the use of AAI in intensive care units. Therapeutic effects are attributed to neuroendocrine mechanisms, particularly activation of the oxytocin system and reduction of cortisol levels, which can alleviate anxiety, pain perception, and psychological stress in critically ill patients. Early studies have reported significant reductions in anxiety without an associated increase in nosocomial infections. However, clinical implementation requires well-defined structural, hygienic, and ethical frameworks, including standardized risk analyses, binding hygiene and animal welfare standards, and multiprofessional collaboration integrating intensive care, nursing, infection control, and animal therapy. This paper presents the first systematic recommendations in Germany for the safe and quality-assured integration of animal-assisted interventions into intensive care practice and calls for scientifically accompanied implementation focusing on patient safety, animal welfare, and team well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41504779What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.