ArticleHippocampus2026
Older Rats Switch Between Distinctly Different Behavior Strategies to Solve the Spatial Version of the Morris Watermaze.
Article in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intact spatial learning in Fmr1Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It has been established that aged rats are worse at learning the spatial version of the Morris watermaze task compared to their younger counterparts. It remains unclear, however, whether this poorer performance by the older rats can be attributed to the use of different behavioral strategies to solve the task. We trained young (6-9 months, n = 37) and old (19-22 months, n = 65) male Fischer 344 rats on the Morris watermaze for four consecutive days with six trials per day. Using Rtrack, an automated discriminant classifier, we analyzed each rat's swimming trajectory to estimate the probability of the rat using one of eight distinct navigation strategies on each given trial. Across acquisition, the behavioral strategy profiles diverged markedly by age. The use of both platform-independent and procedural strategy types declined across learning in young rats in favor of allocentric ones. In contrast, there was no decline in the old rats' use of procedural strategies across learning, although their use of allocentric strategies did increase across days. The allocentric strategies that older animals favored tended to be less accurate than those favored by young rats. To investigate the tendency to switch strategies between trials, the entropy of strategy transition matrices was calculated. Young rats exhibited lower entropy between trials, which reflects the fact that they tended to converge onto a restricted set of allocentric strategies by Day 4. Old rats, on the other hand, had higher entropy, reflecting the fact that they continued to interleave procedural and allocentric strategies throughout training. These results align with human literature that hypothesizes that aging shifts the balance of strategy selection from allocentric hippocampus-dependent circuits to procedural extra-hippocampal circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.