ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2026
Elucidating the nociceptive role of CGRP in migraine headache.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calcitonin gene-related peptide induces headache attacks in people with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Trial
- Effects of erenumab on migraine aura frequency: a REFORM study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Trial
- A delayed endothelial-glial mechanism for CGRP-induced migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Review
- Nociceptive action of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the trigeminovascular system.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is thought to be a key player in the pathogenesis of migraine, but there is a fundamental mystery in that the known neuronal actions of CGRP do not account for how it causes pain. We now report the first finding of CGRP-induced nociceptive neuronal activation using a novel method of intra-carotid infusion to achieve a more targeted delivery to cranial tissues. Single-unit recordings were performed in anaesthetized rats to measure CGRP effects on first- and second-order trigeminovascular neurons. CGRP was administered via intra-carotid infusion. Neuronal activation and sensitization were assessed by spontaneous firing rates and responses to mechanical stimulation of dural and facial receptive fields. Lidocaine was applied locally to the dura or trigeminal ganglion at varying time points to determine the peripheral contribution to CGRP-induced activity. Intra-carotid CGRP infusion (5 µg/kg/min, 20 min) activated 62% of Aδ-fibres and 56% of C-fibres, with significant increases in firing rates beginning within the first 30 min for Aδ-fibres and after 1 h for C-fibres. It also activated 75% of central trigeminovascular neurons, significantly increasing spontaneous firing and sensitizing dural and facial receptive fields. Similar effects were produced by CGRP injection into the trigeminal ganglion. These effects of CGRP were impeded by local anaesthetic blockade of the dura or trigeminal ganglion before but not 1 h after CGRP infusion. No significant sex differences were found in baseline firing or in the magnitude and timing of CGRP-induced responses across all neuron types. These findings provide the first evidence of peripheral nociceptive neuronal activation by CGRP, with a site of action in the meninges, and support a rationale for early, peripherally acting CGRP-targeted migraine treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.