ArticleHealth science reports2026
How Assured Is Health in Peru? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2019 National Household Survey.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: In Peru, disparities in medical services have been reported, but costs have not been assessed based on the different health insurance (HI) available. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to determine the differences in the cost of consultations and medicines in Peruvians with different types of HI according to the 2019 National Household Survey (ENAHO), which is a representative dataset of the Peruvian population. Methods: A multivariate-regression model was used to analyze the relationship between the expenditure on consultations, medicines, dental services, and other expenses and the type of HI. In this case, the type depends on the provider: (1) Social HI called "Seguro Integral de Salud" (SIS) of the Ministry of Health (MINSA); (2) ESSALUD Social Insurance; (3) Armed Forces; and (4) Private sector. Our regressions include demographic controls, and we declared the corresponding survey design to obtain correct standard errors. Results: A total of 15,592,649 (47.7%) and 8,159,941 (25%) people had SIS and ESSALUD, respectively. In the first quartile, 77.6% had access to HI through the SIS and 16.1% were uninsured; in the fourth quartile, only 17.3% had access to the SIS. 80% and 6% of people in rural areas have access to SIS and ESSALUD, respectively. In urban areas, there is a higher percentage of people who do not have HI (24% vs. 14% in rural areas) ( Conclusions: Our results showed differences in the expenditures on consultations, availability of medicines, and costs among people presenting different types of HI affiliations according to ENAHO 2019, where the SIS covers a wide range of insured persons generating high disbursements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.