ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Evaluation of a serum protein signature as monitoring biomarker for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy in a long-term clinical trial with corticosteroids.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive neuromuscular disorder for which monitoring biomarkers are urgently needed. We aimed to evaluate whether proteins in serum can accurately monitor patients' function within the duration of a clinical trial. Methods: In this study, we evaluated longitudinal serum proteins of DMD patients participating to the FOR-DMD clinical trial, comparing daily and intermittent corticosteroid regimens in boys aged 4-8 years at baseline. Using the aptamer-based protein platform SomaScan, we profiled 1500 proteins. Associations between protein levels and motor function outcomes, such as Rise from the Floor Velocity (RFV), 10-Meter Run/Walk Velocity (10MRWV), and North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), were assessed using linear mixed models. In particular, we explored whether patients with higher protein levels also tended to have better functional scores (across-patients analysis), and whether changes in protein levels within the same patient over time were linked to changes in their functional performance (within-patient analysis). Finally, penalized (Lasso) mixed models were applied to evaluate the predictive function of the proteins. The prediction accuracy of the models (evaluated by optimism-corrected Root Mean Squared Error) was compared to that of a simpler model with only age and treatment as predictors. Results: Across-patients and within-patient analyses revealed consistent associations with three functional tests for a subset of proteins, notably RGMA, ART3, ANTXR2, and CFB. Multivariate models incorporating the proteins significantly associated with at least two tests, improved prediction accuracy for NSAA and RFV by 21% and 8%, respectively. These models also revealed a subset of proteins that were consistently selected. Quantification of CFB, RGMA, ANTXR2, SERPINF1 and ATP5PF using SomaScan showed strong agreement with measurements obtained using orthogonal methods such as ELISA, MRM-MS and an in-house developed bead-based sandwich immunoassay. Discussion: These findings support the utility of serum protein signatures as objective, quantitative tools for monitoring disease progression and treatment response in DMD during clinical visits and clinical trials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.