ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
User experiences with a digital health family planning counseling tool for women living with HIV in Kenya.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Women with HIV(WLHIV) have diverse and complex reproductive health needs that require patient-centered, informed decision making. Digital tools to support reproductive life planning may improve reproductive health counseling and outcomes for these women. We evaluated user-experiences with a self-administered, tablet-based family planning(FP) counseling tool as part of a packaged digital health intervention evaluated in a cluster randomized trial in Kenya. We conducted focus group discussions with WLWH who received the counseling tool(n=10) and in-depth interviews with providers(n=10). Data were collected using semi-structured guides, transcribed, translated, and thematically analyzed. Among 95 women, median age was 26 years and 52% were married. Providers had median 7 years' experience. WLWH and providers found the counseling tool acceptable, and felt it improved decision-making, FP knowledge, and patient-provider interactions. Women reported the counseling tool supported informed FP decisions, educated on less familiar options, and dispelled myths and misconceptions. Providers said the counseling tool helped tailor counseling though it was challenging to use with women with more FP experience or with a selected method, but helpful among FP-initiators and adolescents. The counseling tool was useful and acceptable, but too lengthy. Tailoring the counseling tool and making it optional for specific groups of WLWH may improve feasibility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.