Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41503407›Full record

ReviewBioscience2026

A boost for integrative rethinking of resilience in water-driven transitional ecosystems.

Pilar Hurtado, Francisco Lloret, Pol Capdevila, Rebeca Arias-Real

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pilar HurtadoDepartment of Biology and Geology, Physics, and Inorganic Chemistry, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco LloretUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain.
Pol CapdevilaDepartament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Facultat de Biologia, Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Rebeca Arias-RealNational Museum of Natural Sciences-Spanish National Research Council, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9504-9418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing operational approaches to assess and forecast resilience is critical for understanding ecosystem responses to global change. Current methods fall short when applied to water-driven transitional ecosystems, which undergo periodic shifts between aquatic and terrestrial phases. These ecosystems are highly sensitive to changes in historical wet-dry regimes, yet existing approaches often neglect the interconnection and compensatory dynamics between phases, yielding unreliable resilience estimates. We propose a holistic approach that integrates the entire wet-dry cycle and treats aquatic and terrestrial phases as interconnected components of a scalable meta-ecosystem. This perspective captures key resilience mechanisms-species turnover and functional redundancy driving compensatory effects-that sustain biodiversity and functioning across phases. By framing resilience as an emergent ecosystem property, our system-wide approach identifies essential elements for reliable assessments and provides a functional pathway to make resilience evaluations more actionable, with broad implications for managing water-driven transitional ecosystems under global change.

Indexed as

biological coversrecoveryresilienceresistancewater availability

Identifiers

PMID41503407
PMCPMC12771526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.