ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Mowing Modulates the Biotic Filter of Expansive Species.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mowing Modulates the Biotic Filter of Expansive Species.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disturbance and competition are two strong drivers of plant community formation. Disturbances like mowing in semi-natural grasslands enhance taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity by preventing the establishment of expansive species, which act as a biotic filter. However, how mowing and expansive species influence alpha and beta diversity, and how mowing may modulate the effects of expansive species on plant communities, remains largely overlooked. We sampled 61 (0.5 × 0.5 m) vegetation plots in abandoned and mown semi-natural grassland in Central Italy characterised by varying degrees of cover of expansive species. We used Rao's Quadratic Entropy to quantify alpha and beta taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity and we performed multiple regression models to evaluate the effect of management types (mowing and abandonment), expansive species cover, and their interaction. Overall, mown grasslands hosted higher alpha and beta taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity than abandoned grasslands. Alpha taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity decreased with increasing expansive species cover, whereas for beta diversity, only the taxonomic facet is negatively affected. For all diversities except beta-phylogenetic diversity, we detected a significant interaction between the effect of management types and expansive species cover, with their effects being stronger in mown than abandoned grasslands. Mowing represents a management type capable of counteracting homogenisation due to land abandonment at multiple spatial scales, by allowing a higher number of species with distinct lineages to persist locally. Expansive species acts as a biotic filter in reducing the plant diversity within the community, but its effect on homogenising plant communities was weaker. However, the intensity of this biotic filter was more intense in mown grasslands than in abandoned ones, probably due to higher species richness. Our findings highlight how complex these drivers are and that management can modulate the filterering effect of expansive species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.