ReviewInfectious Disease Modelling2026
Spatio-temporal forecasting of dengue in the Americas through hybrid mechanistic and data-driven models: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatio-temporal forecasting of dengue in the Americas through hybrid mechanistic and data-driven models: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420251130769) synthesises 30 dengue modelling studies conducted in the Americas between 2016 and 2025, evaluating the integration of mechanistic and data-driven approaches. We quantified the reliability of diverse modelling frameworks by applying a Standardised Predictive Fidelity Index (SPFI). Our synthesis reveals a robust positive association between temperature and dengue risk across all methodologies (pooled relative risk (RR) = 1.26 [95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.18-1.35]). However, a critical performance dichotomy remains: while mechanistic models exhibit high variance dependent on calibration quality, temporal regression analysis confirms that machine learning architectures have achieved statistically significant convergence towards high predictive fidelity (median SPFI: 0.89) since 2023. Despite their precision, data-driven models remain disconnected from the causal logic necessary for intervention simulation. To address this methodological fragmentation, we have developed a functional "glass-box" hybrid architecture, which is defined by three evidence-based pathways: the dynamic parameterisation of mechanistic cores via machine learning; the enforcement of biological constraints on predictive algorithms; and the continuous assimilation of data. We conclude that transitioning from descriptive science to this operational, data-assimilating hybrid framework is essential for enabling precise, location-specific public health responses to the escalating dengue crisis in the Americas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.