Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41503361›Full record

ArticleACS environmental Au2025

Advancing Circular Bioeconomy through a Systems-Level Assessment of Food Waste and Industrial Sludge Codigestion.

Md Nizam Uddin, Cassidy Hartog, Emma Murray, Jacob B Loveless, Lukas Roberson, Asli Aslan, Francisco Cubas, Lewis S Rowles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS environmental Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Md Nizam UddinDepartment of Civil Engineering and Construction, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia 30458, United States.
Cassidy HartogMath Department, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia 30458, United States.
Emma MurrayDepartment of Civil Engineering and Construction, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia 30458, United States.
Jacob B LovelessInstitute for Water and Health, Georgia Southern University, Savannah, Georgia 31419, United States.
Lukas RobersonInstitute for Water and Health, Georgia Southern University, Savannah, Georgia 31419, United States.
Asli AslanInstitute for Water and Health, Georgia Southern University, Savannah, Georgia 31419, United States.
Francisco CubasDepartment of Civil Engineering and Construction, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia 30458, United States.
Lewis S RowlesDepartment of Civil Engineering and Construction, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia 30458, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-9179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disposal of food waste (FW) in landfills remains an unsustainable practice for organic waste management. Simultaneously, pulp and paper mills produce significant amounts of recalcitrant organic waste that is difficult to decompose due to its high lignocellulosic content. In this study, we developed an innovative approach to improve the digestion of pulp and paper mill sludge (PPMS) by amending FW to produce a low chemical oxygen demand (COD) sludge while recovering methane in the process. This codigestion process was evaluated through lab-scale biogas production experiments coupled with a comprehensive economic and environmental sustainability assessment. Biomethane production results revealed that the FW-PPMS codigestion methane yield was 36% higher on average than the PPMS monodigestion. Additionally, metagenomic analysis revealed that microbial communities for both systems transitioned from highly heterogeneous to more adapted uniform communities after digestion. Improved microbial communities contributed to higher COD removal (92%) in the FW-PPMS system compared to monodigestion (80% removal). The sustainability analysis revealed that the codigestion of FW-PPMS had median costs of 236.64 USD·tonne

Indexed as

anaerobic codigestionindustrial symbiosislife cycle assessmentmicrobial community dynamicsorganic waste valorizationsustainable waste managementtechno-economic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41503361
PMCPMC12772522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.