Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41503339›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Computer Vision in Upper Limb Orthopaedics: A Scoping Review of Imaging-Based Algorithms for Fracture Detection and Radiographic Measurement.

Nimra Akram, Bilal Qaddoura, Donia Karimaghaei, Sirtaaj Mattoo, Abdullah Al-Jumaili, Sarkhell Radha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nimra AkramTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, GBR.
Bilal QaddouraTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Donia KarimaghaeiTrauma and Orthopaedics, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Sirtaaj MattooTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, GBR.
Abdullah Al-JumailiTrauma and Orthopaedics, Croydon University Hospital, London, GBR.
Sarkhell RadhaOrthopaedics, Croydon University Hospital, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer vision techniques are increasingly applied to medical imaging and may provide valuable assistance in upper limb orthopaedics, a field where radiographs, CT, MRI, and ultrasound are central to diagnosis and treatment planning. The development of deep learning has made automated interpretation of orthopaedic imaging both feasible and increasingly accurate. This review maps and characterises the current use of computer vision in upper limb orthopaedics, describing the clinical problems addressed, the imaging modalities used, and the methodological approaches reported in the literature. Ovid MEDLINE and Embase were searched from January 1995 to October 2025. Studies were eligible if they applied an automated or semi-automated computer vision technique to upper limb imaging for diagnostic or planning purposes. Conference abstracts and non-orthopaedic applications were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data extraction followed the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most focused on wrist and shoulder imaging, particularly radiograph-based fracture detection and postoperative morphometric assessment. Convolutional neural networks, detection networks (e.g., YOLO), and segmentation architectures (e.g., U-Net) were most commonly used. Performance was generally high across fracture classification and measurement tasks, although most studies were retrospective, single-centre-based, and lacked external validation. Computer vision in upper limb orthopaedics remains at an early but promising stage. Automated systems for fracture detection and radiographic measurement demonstrate encouraging accuracy, yet widespread clinical use is limited by small datasets, lack of prospective validation, and inconsistent reporting. Future research should prioritise reproducible multicentre studies, inclusion of soft-tissue modalities, and exploration of intra-operative and real-time clinical applications.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (ai)computer visionmsk radiologyorthopaedic surgery shoulder and elbow and upper extremityscoping review

Identifiers

PMID41503339
PMCPMC12774290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.