Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41503301›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Neuromodulation Across Neurological Disorders Toward Personalized Brain Stimulation: A Narrative Review.

Meet Popatbhai Kachhadia, Imad Sibhai, Rushi Vaghela, Usmaan Topiwala, Juber D Shaikh, Michelle Tsai, Nirali Borad, Michael Simon, Hasan Ilyas, Touqir Zahra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meet Popatbhai KachhadiaNeurology, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Imad SibhaiMedical Education, Smt. N. H. L. Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Rushi VaghelaInternal Medicine, Smt. N. H. L. Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Usmaan TopiwalaGeneral Medicine, Smt. N. H. L. Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Juber D ShaikhNeurology, Prisma Health/University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Michelle TsaiInternal Medicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Nirali BoradPediatrics, WVU Thomas Memorial Hospital, Charleston, USA.
Michael SimonNeurology, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Hasan IlyasInternal Medicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Touqir ZahraInternal Medicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurological and psychiatric disorders such as Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, epilepsy, Tourette's syndrome, depression, and chronic pain remain major causes of disability worldwide. For patients who fail to respond to medication, neuromodulation, particularly deep-brain stimulation (DBS), has become a cornerstone therapy. Traditional open-loop DBS delivers continuous stimulation using pre-set parameters, yielding substantial clinical benefits but also limitations, including side effects, energy inefficiency, and lack of adaptability to dynamic brain states. These drawbacks have motivated the development of closed-loop, or adaptive, DBS systems, which incorporate real-time biomarkers to adjust stimulation in response to neural or physiological signals. Emerging clinical studies demonstrate that closed-loop approaches can improve symptom control in selected disorders, while consistently reducing stimulation time and prolonging device longevity. Despite promising results, outcomes remain heterogeneous across patients, largely due to variability in biomarkers, algorithms, and methodological approaches. Ethical considerations and technical challenges also remain significant barriers to widespread implementation. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on open- and closed-loop neuromodulation across neurological and psychiatric disorders, emphasizing their comparative advantages, limitations, and translational challenges. We highlight the role of biomarkers, adaptive algorithms, and machine learning in shaping personalized neuromodulation and argue that closed-loop stimulation represents a paradigm shift toward precision medicine. Ultimately, the integration of robust biomarkers, predictive algorithms, and scalable clinical frameworks will be critical to realizing the full potential of closed-loop neuromodulation in transforming brain stimulation therapies.

Indexed as

deep brain stimulation. parkinson’s diseaseepilepsyneuromodulationpaintremor

Identifiers

PMID41503301
PMCPMC12771547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.