ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026
Protein embeddings and local alignments.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Clustering-based progressive alignment with fuzzy logic (CPA-FL).Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- PhaLP 2.0: extending the community-oriented phage lysin database with a SUBLYME pipeline for metagenomic discovery.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The advent of protein embeddings has revolutionized bioinformatics by providing contextual representations that capture functional and evolutionary patterns. They have become, alongside sequence alignments, the cornerstone of bioinformatics. Embeddings cannot replace alignments but they can greatly help improve their quality. While embedding-based improvements have been considered for global alignments, the more important counterpart, local alignments, has not been studied thoroughly. Our goal is to identify the most accurate local alignment algorithm for protein sequences. Results: We introduce a new scoring function into our previous E-score algorithm by using Ankh embeddings. We prove that the resulting algorithm produces the most accurate local alignments of protein sequences using a new comprehensive framework that enables thorough evaluation of local alignment quality. We design a new algorithm for local alignment extraction, localization and quality evaluation and employ five distance metrics to evaluate the similarity with the true alignment. We also build multiple datasets, using both natural and inserted sequences, from the Conserved Domain Database, BAliBASE, and GPCRdb. We perform over two and a half million tests to compare the new algorithm with the best BLOSUM matrices, specialized GPCRtm matrices, and top programs, such as PEbA, DEDAL, vcMSA and pLM-BLAST. Our testing also reveals interesting insights into the behaviour of various protein language models as some of them perform much better on natural sequences compared to artificial ones obtained by inserting domains into random protein sequences. Also, while some models combine to produce better results, Ankh does not combine well with other embeddings. Conclusions: The new, Ankh-score-based, program is clearly superior to all existing methods. New light shed on the protein embeddings can guide future improvements. In order to facilitate the use of the new method and protocol, they are freely available as a web server at e-score.csd.uwo.ca and as source code at github.com/lucian-ilie/E-score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.