ArticleBrain & spine2026
Size of decompressive craniectomy as prognostic factor in space-occupying ischemic cerebellar stroke -a multicentric retrospective study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In cases of space-occupying cerebellar ischemic strokes, guidelines recommend suboccipital decompressive surgery (SDC). While in supratentorial hemispheric stroke, the size of the bone flap has been the subject of many studies and ample debate, no studies have been conducted to determine the optimal size of the bone flap to be removed in SDC. Research question: To determine the optimal size of SDC in ischemic cerebellar stroke. Methods: This is a multicentric retrospective study of patients undergoing SDC for ischemic cerebellar stroke. SDC size was determined in two perpendicular planes on early postoperative CT scans: (a) maximal lateral extension (L) and (b) maximal craniocaudal extension (CC) in cm. The primary endpoint was functional outcome according to modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at three months. Secondary outcome was mortality at three months, as well as surgical complications. Results: A total of 88 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean L diameter of the SDC analyzed was 7 cm (SD 1.5), whereas the mean CC diameter was 4.4 cm (SD .8). When dichotomizing patients based on a threshold of L ≥ 6.5 cm, favorable outcome was more likely in the group with L ≥ 6.5 cm (OR = 3.23, 95%CI 1.02-10.56, p = .045). No statistically significant differences were observed in mortality at three months (OR = .66, 95%CI .24-1.78, p = .40). Conclusions: In ischemic cerebellar stroke, a suboccipital craniectomy with a maximum lateral diameter of ≥6.5 cm appears to yield better functional outcomes than smaller ones. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.