ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Current Role of Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap in Breast Reconstruction: Review and Case Reports.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (pTRAM) flap has long been a cornerstone in breast reconstruction. Despite the increasing adoption of muscle-sparing options such as the deep inferior epigasetric perforator flap, the pTRAM remains relevant, particularly in resource-limited settings or in patients unsuitable for microsurgery. This systematic review aimed to evaluate its current indications, outcomes, and clinical utility. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a literature search of PubMed was conducted using the terms "pedicled TRAM flap" and "breast reconstruction," covering studies published from 2014 to 2024. A total of 43 articles, including original studies and case reports, met the inclusion criteria. Additionally, 2 clinical cases from our institution were presented to illustrate contemporary applications. Results: The pTRAM flap offers several advantages: shorter operative times, independence from microvascular techniques, and versatility in complex reconstructive scenarios. It is especially suitable for patients with prior radiation therapy, vessel-depleted fields, or contraindications to free flap surgery. Although donor-site complications such as abdominal bulging and hernias remain concerns, outcomes have improved with mesh reinforcement and vascular delay techniques. Across included studies, aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction were high, and major complications were uncommon. Conclusions: The pTRAM flap remains a reliable and accessible choice for breast reconstruction, particularly in patients or settings where microsurgery is not feasible. Although deep inferior epigasetric perforator flaps provide superior muscle preservation, the pTRAM combines speed, safety, and predictable results, maintaining a significant role in modern reconstructive practice. Mastery of this technique facilitates the transition to advanced microsurgical procedures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.