Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41503147›Full record

ArticleDEN open2026

Stepwise Algorithm for Biliary Cannulation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Era of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Akihiko Senju, Takuji Iwashita, Takuya Koizumi, Yosuke Ohashi, Shota Iwata, Akinori Maruta, Shinya Uemura, Masahito Shimizu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Akihiko SenjuFirst Department of Internal Medicine Gifu University Hospital Gifu Japan.
Takuji IwashitaFirst Department of Internal Medicine Gifu University Hospital Gifu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-1787
Takuya KoizumiFirst Department of Internal Medicine Gifu University Hospital Gifu Japan.
Yosuke OhashiFirst Department of Internal Medicine Gifu University Hospital Gifu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6784-6600
Shota IwataFirst Department of Internal Medicine Gifu University Hospital Gifu Japan.
Akinori MarutaFirst Department of Internal Medicine Gifu University Hospital Gifu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2166-715X
Shinya UemuraFirst Department of Internal Medicine Gifu University Hospital Gifu Japan.
Masahito ShimizuFirst Department of Internal Medicine Gifu University Hospital Gifu Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an essential procedure for the management of biliary diseases. Successful biliary cannulation is the first step. Advanced cannulation techniques, such as the double-guidewire technique (DGW), precut techniques, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided rendezvous (RV), have been developed to improve cannulation success. However, comprehensive evaluations of a structured cannulation algorithm remain limited. Aims: To evaluate the status of biliary cannulation and associated adverse events (AEs) using a stepwise cannulation algorithm. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of 1,000 consecutive patients with a naïve papilla who underwent ERCP for biliary disease was performed between 2012 and 2022. Biliary cannulation was attempted using a stepwise algorithm, beginning with wire-loaded cannulation (WLC), followed by DGW, precut techniques, and EUS-RV. The primary endpoint was overall technical success; secondary endpoints included AEs, incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), and risk factor analysis. Results: Initial WLC achieved selective biliary cannulation in 69.2% of cases. Salvage techniques achieved high success rates: DGW (74.9%), precut techniques (77.6%), and EUS-RV (97.0%). Overall, the final cannulation success rate was 97.8%. The overall AE rate was 7.5%, with PEP being the most common (6.1%). AEs were significantly more frequent in advanced cannulation techniques than WLC (13.3% vs. 5.2%, Conclusion: A structured stepwise approach achieves very high biliary cannulation success in patients with a naïve papilla, though advanced cannulation techniques increase AE risk. Appropriate timing and positioning of EUS-RV may further optimize safety and efficacy in biliary cannulation.

Indexed as

difficult biliary cannulationdouble‐guidewire techniqueendoscopic ultrasound‐guided rendezvous technique (EUS‐RV)post‐ERCP pancreatitisprecut technique

Identifiers

PMID41503147
PMCPMC12772438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.