ArticleRemote sensing2025
Evaluation of Atmospheric Preprocessing Methods and Chlorophyll Algorithms for Sentinel-2 Imagery in Coastal Waters.
Article in Remote sensing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cyanobacterial blooms have been increasingly detected in estuaries and freshwater tidal rivers. To enhance detailed monitoring, an efficient approach to detecting algal blooms through remote sensing is needed to focus more detailed monitoring focused on cyanobacteria. In this study, we compared different remote sensing processing methods to determine an efficient approach to mapping chlorophyll-a. Using a subset of paired chlorophyll-a observations with Sentinel-2 imagery (2015-2022), with sites located in the Chesapeake Bay and Indian River selected along gradients of salinity, turbidity, and trophic status, we compared the combined performance of two different atmospheric processing methods (Acolite, Polymer) and a suite of empirical (band ratio, spectral shape indices) and machine learning algorithms for chlorophyll-a prediction. Acolite outperformed Polymer, resulting in 176 observation points, compared to 106 observation points from Polymer, and a greater range in chlorophyll-a values (0-74 μg/L from Acolite compared to 0-36 μg/L from Polymer), although Polymer showed more responsiveness at lower chlorophyll-a levels. Two algorithms performed best in predicting chlorophyll-a, as well as trophic state and HABs risk classes: the machine learning mixture density network (MDN) approach and the one band-ratio approach (Mishra).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.