ArticleBlood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis2026
Automated natural language processing to identify venous thromboembolism from diagnostic imaging reports.
Article in Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Venous Thromboembolism Prevention: A Narrative Review of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Natural Language Processing.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The annual incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) may be 50-fold increased after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Such incidence data, as well as data that establish clinical variables resulting in this enhanced risk, have generally required manual chart review. This cumbersome process can be improved by natural language processing (NLP) algorithms designed to detect VTE in electronic medical record systems. We describe the development of an institutional NLP algorithm for VTE detection, and our evaluation of its performance in detecting VTE in patients who recently underwent HSCT. We retrospectively reviewed adult patients between 2016 and 2020. NLP assessed patient records for acute VTE within 100 days of HSCT, and manual chart review was performed for comparison. NLP sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. A total of 1300 electronic health records were analyzed. The 100-day VTE incidence rate as determined via manual chart review and NLP was 10.3% and 8.8%, respectively. NLP's specificity, sensitivity, PPV, and NPV were >0.85. Of the 19 events not identified by NLP, all were found in radiology or vascular laboratory reports overlooked by NLP. These results demonstrate excellent performance of NLP for identifying VTE in HSCT patients. Future refinement of NLP, and its combination with other detection methods should provide better detection of VTE in this and other at-risk cohorts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.