Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41503121›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2025

Validation of the Thai version of the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF-THAI) among Thai nursing students in northeast Thailand: A multi-centre study.

Ueamporn Summart, Monthida Sangruangake, Jumrusluk Charoensaen, Wiraporn Suebsoontorn, Metha Songthamwat

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ueamporn SummartFaculty of Nursing, Roi Et Rajabhat University, Kho Kaew Subdistrict, Selaphum District, Roi Et, 45120, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-2199
Monthida SangruangakeFaculty of Nursing, Udon Thani Rajabhat University, Udon Thani, Udon Thani, Thailand.
Jumrusluk CharoensaenFaculty of Nursing, Roi Et Rajabhat University, Ko Kaeo Subdistrict, Selaphum District, Roi Et, Thailand.
Wiraporn SuebsoontornFaculty of Nursing, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Nakhon Ratchasima, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Metha SongthamwatDepartment of Obstetric and Gynaecology, Udon Thani Hospital, Udon Thani, Udon Thani, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5694-8138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Thai version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF-THAI) has been verified among a variety of populations. However, there is a lack of existing research on its comprehensive psychometric properties, specifically when used with nursing students. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties (construct validity, internal consistency, and convergent validity) of the WHOQOL-BREF- THAI among nursing students in northeastern Thailand. Methods: In this methodology study, Thai nursing students were recruited using multi-stage simple random sampling from universities located in the northeast of Thailand. The data was collected via self-assessment questionnaires, and the 3,570 participants were then randomly split into two subsamples. After reducing the number of items using statistical methods, construct validity was identified by performing exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (n = 2,000), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n = 1,570), and convergent validity using average variance extracted (AVE). For scale reliability, the internal consistency and stability were performed using Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient and composite reliability (CR). Results: Principal component analysis on a random subsample supported a four-factor model with 24 items, originally suggested for factorial construct validity; these 24 items were distributed across the original four domain with a cumulative variance of 75.6%. CFA of the model revealed satisfactory indices of fitness (Chi-square/degree of freedom (CMIN/DF) = 113; root mean square error of approximation = 0.05; goodness of fit index = 0.97; and Tucker-Levis index = 0.91). The internal consistency was highly satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha was greater than 0.70) for both the total scale and ksubscales, and the CR values of the four domains, ranging from 0.76 to 0.95, indicated evidence of acceptable reliability. In terms of convergent validity, AVE revealed that all WHOQOL-BREF-THAI subscales achieved convergence, with AVE values ranging from 0.50 to 0.69. Conclusion: These results reveal that the WHOQOL-BREF-THAI is a valid and reliable tool which health care providers can utilize to measure QOL among Thai nursing students. Therefore, the WHOQOL-BREF can serve as an essential tool for researching the factors influencing nursing students' QOL, with implications for nursing education.

Indexed as

PsychometricsQuality of LifeStudents, NursingWorld Health OrganizationAdolescentAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSoutheast Asian PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesThailandYoung AdultConfirmatory factor analysis.NursingQuality of lifeSoutheast Asian peopleWHOQOL-BREF

Identifiers

PMID41503121
PMCPMC12770885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.