ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
Ultrasound neuromodulation as a novel dementia therapy-Investigation of possible long-term confounds.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound neuromodulation in brain disorders: from mechanotransduction mechanisms to clinical translation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Ultrasound neuromodulation as a novel dementia therapy-Investigation of possible long-term confounds.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUltrasound neuromodulation has emerged as a promising adjunctive therapy in Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet a controversial issue remains: whether its reported long-term therapeutic effects could be attributed to potential confounds rather than genuine neuromodulatory mechanisms. Although auditory confounds via air- or bone-conducted sound have been discussed for immediate effects, their relevance for enduring therapeutic outcomes-essential for clinical application-remains unknown. This exploratory study is the first to examine whether long-term cognitive and neural effects of transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) in AD are linked to persistent auditory network activation.
methodsA comprehensive re-analysis of task-based and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data was conducted using data from the currently largest sham-controlled clinical ultrasound neuromodulation study (Matt et al., 2025). To isolate possible auditory contributions, we applied a contrast-based framework targeting (1) air-conducted sound, (2) combined air- and possibly bone-conducted sound, and (3) bone-conduction-specific effects. Analyses included: (a) task-based auditory cortex co-activation, (b) functional connectivity between auditory and dorsal attention networks (the latter was modulated in the original study), (c) global efficiency within the auditory network, and (d) correlations with neuropsychological test battery scores.
resultsNo significant long-term activation of auditory cortices was observed in task-based fMRI. Resting-state analyses showed no altered connectivity between auditory and attention networks, no changes in auditory network global efficiency, and no associations between auditory metrics and cognitive performance. Effect-size estimates were small, and 95% confidence intervals placed conservative upper bounds that argue against sizeable, sustained auditory confounds. These findings were consistent across all contrast conditions.
conclusionUsing data from a rigorously controlled cognitive trial, we found no evidence of long-term auditory network effects following TPS. This makes it unlikely that auditory confounds are a key factor underlying the cognitive network effects observed with long-term ultrasound neuromodulation in typical verum-sham settings as investigated here. Highlights: Long-term transcranial pulse stimulation effects were evaluated for potential auditory confounds using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).Analyses included task-fMRI, resting-state functional connectivity, and auditory network efficiency.No auditory long-term effects were detected.Auditory confounds are unlikely to be the key factor for cognitive network effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.