ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2025
Psychometric properties and factor structure of the short form of the cyberchondria severity scale (CSS-12) amongst Indian adults.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cyberchondria refers to an increase in anxiety and distress because of excessive and repeated online health searches. The Cyberchondria Severity Scale-12 (CSS-12) is the most widely used validated measure to assess cyberchondria. It has consistently emerged as a reliable and valid brief measure to assess cyberchondria. Aim: The current study validated the CSS-12 for the Indian adult population. Methods: The data was collected online using a cross-sectional design from 326 participants ( Results: The content validity index (CVI) for relevancy, accuracy and clarity of the scale was 0.99, 0.97, and 0.92, respectively. CFA showed good fit indexes [comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.929; Tukey-Lewis's index (TLI) = 0.903; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.75]. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were 0.74, 0.81, respectively. 5.8% fall in the moderate level of cyberchondria and 2.1% of participants were found to have high level of cyberchondria. Conclusion: It can be used for detection, management, and treatment monitoring purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.