ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2026
Suspected ophthalmic artery fat embolus following bilateral elbow liposuction.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To present a rare case of a suspected ophthalmic artery fat embolus in a patient who underwent bilateral elbow liposuction. Observations: The patient, a 44-year-old female with past smoking history and stable meningioma with no associated symptoms, presented with episodes of transient vision loss followed by a persistent "arc-like" scotoma in her left eye one month after bilateral elbow liposuction. Ophthalmic examination and imaging of the left eye revealed a visual acuity of 20/25, a paracentral scotoma, delayed perfusion, and decreased retinal thickness. A head and neck computerized tomography angiogram with intravenous contrast and diagnostic cerebral angiogram identified occlusion of the left ophthalmic artery. Following this, she received intra-arterial tissue plasminogen activator, after which her vision subjectively deteriorated, accompanied by an enlargement of the paracentral scotoma, the development of a new relative afferent pupillary defect, and additional areas of retinal ischemia. Coagulation studies, autoimmune studies, and echocardiogram imaging showed no remarkable findings, thereby decreasing the likelihood of other vascular or embolic etiologies. At her most recent follow-up visit, five months post-presentation, she reported no worsening of her symptoms or scotoma. Examination and imaging demonstrated stabilization of her ocular findings. Conclusions and importance: This case highlights the potential risk of ocular complications following non-facial cosmetic procedures, emphasizing the need for ophthalmologists to carefully review patients' cosmetic surgery histories when assessing unexplained visual symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.