ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Portuguese version of the self-care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease inventory.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nursing interventions to enhance self-care in heart failure: a systematic review interpreted through the COM-B model.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major global cause of death, marked by frequent exacerbations, high healthcare use, and reduced quality of life. Its progressive nature requires continuous self-care and symptom management. Understanding how individuals make self-care decisions is key to developing patient-centered nursing interventions. This study validates a theory-based instrument designed to assess core self-care domains in individuals living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, addressing gaps in existing tools that insufficiently capture behavioral aspects of disease management. Objective: To translate and adapt the Self-care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory to the Portuguese context and to test its psychometric properties on a sample of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Portugal. Design: A methodological study focused on the validation of an instrument. Settings: A Local Health Unit and its aggregated primary care centers from a municipality in the north region of Portugal. Participants: 196 patients met the inclusion criteria and accepted to participate in the study. Methods: Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis and hypothesis testing, while internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Results: A convenience sample of 196 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients was recruited from September 2023 to February 2024. The instrument consists of four scales: Self-Care Maintenance, Self-Care Monitoring, Self-Care Management and Self-Care Self-Efficacy. Confirmatory factor analysis was assessed on all four dimensions of the inventory producing acceptable model fit indices. The hypotheses presumed to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed. Internal consistency was adequate with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.673 to 0.893 across the four scales. Conclusions: The Portuguese version of the Self-Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. Some differences were observed compared to the original instrument. Further validation studies are needed to confirm its psychometric characteristics in the Portuguese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.