ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
An Evidence-Grounded Research Assistant for Functional Genomics and Drug Target Assessment.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing availability of biological data resources has transformed research, yet their effective use remains challenging: selecting appropriate sources requires domain knowledge, data are fragmented across databases, and synthesizing results into reliable conclusions is labor-intensive. Although large language models promise to address these barriers, their impact in biomedicine has been limited by unsupported statements, incorrect claims, and lack of provenance. We introduce Alvessa, an evidence-grounded agentic research assistant designed around verifiability. Alvessa integrates entity recognition, orchestration of pre-validated biological tools, and data-constrained answer generation with statement-level verification against retrieved records, explicitly flagging unsupported claims and guiding revision when reliability criteria are not met. We evaluate Alvessa on dbQA from LAB-Bench and GenomeArena, a benchmark of 720 questions spanning gene and variant annotation, pathways, molecular interactions, miRNA targets, drug-target evidence, protein structure, and gene-phenotype associations. Alvessa substantially improves accuracy relative to general-purpose language models and performs comparably to coding-centric agents while producing fully traceable outputs. Using adversarial perturbations, we show that detection of fabricated statements depends critically on access to retrieved evidence. We further demonstrate application to drug discovery, where evidence-grounded synthesis enables identification of candidate targets missed or misattributed by literature-centered reasoning alone. Alvessa and GenomeArena are released to the community to support reproducible, verifiable AI-assisted biological research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.