Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502860›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2025

Incentivizing Collaboration with Core Facilities: Developing an Impactful Core Facility Voucher Program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine.

Kara A Clissold, Christopher W Gregory

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kara A ClissoldOffice of Research Technologies University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Christopher W GregoryDepartment of Genetics and Office of Research Technologies University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Core facilities provide essential institutional infrastructure for answering a broad variety of technical research questions. Funding pilot programs through a core facility voucher system provides opportunities not only for researchers to collaborate with core facilities to further their research aims and produce scholarly output, but also for core directors to gain new long-term customers, develop new pipelines, and bring new services and assays into the core's portfolio. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine manages a core voucher program unique in several regards, including its requirement for a core consultation to ensure all proposals meet core facility standards for rigor and reproducibility, as well as its accessibility to trainees. The operational parameters and return on investment of this core voucher program are described and discussed.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCooperative BehaviorSchools, MedicalAcademiaHumansNorth CarolinaUniversitiescorefundingpilot programShared Research Resource (SRR)voucher program

Identifiers

PMID41502860
PMCPMC12773500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.