ArticleNext research2025
Associations between food frequency checklist responses and internal biomarkers of exposure to pesticides and heavy metals among U.S. pregnant women.
Article in Next research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations between self-reported consumption of foods and serum PFAS concentrations in a sample of pregnant women in the United States.Environmental research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A self-administered food consumption frequency checklist was completed over a 3-day period by 640 pregnant women to assess its utility for identifying associations between exposure to chemical contaminants and food consumption. Responses were segregated by food categories. Demographic information was self-reported. Chemical measurements included cadmium, lead, and methylmercury in blood samples and urinary (creatinine corrected) total arsenic, six organophosphate metabolites (dialkylphosphates), and summed polyaromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) metabolites. Frequencies for each food group were compared to demographics and geometric mean concentrations of each contaminant to determine any associations using a one-way analysis of variance. Age, race/ethnicity, education, and household income showed significant associations with several food groups (p < 0.05). Methylmercury concentrations were significantly associated with consumption of fish. Lead concentrations were significantly associated with consumption of milk, dairy, grains, fruits, and vegetables (p < 0.05). Urinary metabolite concentrations indicated significant associations between total arsenic and fish; dimethyldithiophosphate and water, protein, and fish; dimethylthiophosphate and fish; diethylthiophosphate and fruit and fish; and summed PAHs and water and grains (p < 0.05). Demographic characteristics play a role in potential exposures to these participants. The usefulness of the food frequency checklist to predict chemical exposures through biomarkers in blood and urine was mixed across chemicals and food types in that sometimes the prediction matched expected results (e.g., methylmercury and total arsenic concentrations associated with fish consumption) and sometimes it did not (e.g., no association between summed PAH concentrations and consumption of protein).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.