Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502834›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Quieting "Food Noise": How GLP-1s and Mindfulness Rewire the Default Mode Network (DMN) and Reward Circuits.

Geoff Cook

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Geoff CookNutrition, Noom, Princeton, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review synthesizes evidence identified through targeted searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2010-2025), with a focused selection of human and mechanistic studies examining GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s), food cue reactivity, prospective cognition, mindfulness-based interventions, and neural network dynamics relevant to 'food noise' and the default mode network (DMN). Food noise is conceptualized here as a form of maladaptive prospection: a faulty way of thinking about the future, characterized by repetitive, cue-driven mental simulation of short-term reward at the expense of long-term goals. Existing neuroimaging and behavioral data suggest that GLP-1s may influence neural systems underlying cue salience and reward anticipation, with several reports indicating reduced food-related intrusive thoughts. Although these findings are preliminary, some mechanistic models posit that GLP-1s could attenuate DMN activity associated with food-related rumination, potentially altering the cognitive context in which eating decisions occur. Patient reports of improved focus, reduced cravings, or greater ease in health-related planning are noted in the literature, but causal links to specific behavioral outcomes remain unestablished. This paper advances a testable hypothesis: reductions in food noise may shift the balance of activity among DMN, salience, and executive networks in ways that support more adaptive forms of prospection. However, current evidence is limited, and the proposed mechanisms and behavioral implications require empirical testing. Further research using direct measures of food noise, longitudinal neuroimaging, and controlled behavioral studies is needed to clarify mechanisms and determine their broader relevance for health and self-regulation.

Indexed as

default mode networkdmnexecutive functionfood noiseglp-1glp-1 receptor agonistsmindfulnessobesityprospectionsemaglutide

Identifiers

PMID41502834
PMCPMC12770913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.