ReviewCureus2026
Quieting "Food Noise": How GLP-1s and Mindfulness Rewire the Default Mode Network (DMN) and Reward Circuits.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Correlates of Perceived Food Noise Among U.S. Adults in a Nationally Representative Sample.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review synthesizes evidence identified through targeted searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2010-2025), with a focused selection of human and mechanistic studies examining GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s), food cue reactivity, prospective cognition, mindfulness-based interventions, and neural network dynamics relevant to 'food noise' and the default mode network (DMN). Food noise is conceptualized here as a form of maladaptive prospection: a faulty way of thinking about the future, characterized by repetitive, cue-driven mental simulation of short-term reward at the expense of long-term goals. Existing neuroimaging and behavioral data suggest that GLP-1s may influence neural systems underlying cue salience and reward anticipation, with several reports indicating reduced food-related intrusive thoughts. Although these findings are preliminary, some mechanistic models posit that GLP-1s could attenuate DMN activity associated with food-related rumination, potentially altering the cognitive context in which eating decisions occur. Patient reports of improved focus, reduced cravings, or greater ease in health-related planning are noted in the literature, but causal links to specific behavioral outcomes remain unestablished. This paper advances a testable hypothesis: reductions in food noise may shift the balance of activity among DMN, salience, and executive networks in ways that support more adaptive forms of prospection. However, current evidence is limited, and the proposed mechanisms and behavioral implications require empirical testing. Further research using direct measures of food noise, longitudinal neuroimaging, and controlled behavioral studies is needed to clarify mechanisms and determine their broader relevance for health and self-regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.