ReviewRSC medicinal chemistry2026
On the history, synthesis, and medicinal use of cantharidin, LB-100, and their analogs.
Review in RSC medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthesis and crystal structure ofActa crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2026Article
- The Protein Phosphatase Inhibitor LB100 Targets the Mesenchymal Lineage of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.MedComm · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cantharidin, a defensive toxin produced by blister beetles, has fascinated chemists, physicians, and historians for centuries. From its notorious use as the aphrodisiac "Spanish fly" to its modern FDA approval as YCANTH™ for molluscum contagiosum, this small yet complex molecule has inspired both infamy and innovation. Over the past hundred years, some of the most eminent synthetic chemists, including Professors Diels, Alder, Ziegler, Schenck, Stork, and Dauben, have tackled the formidable challenges of cantharidin synthesis, establishing benchmarks in organic chemistry. Parallel biological studies revealed cantharidin and its analogs as potent inhibitors of serine/threonine protein phosphatases, particularly PP1, PP2A, and PP5, with wide-ranging implications in oncology, immunology, and chemical biology. Derivatives such as norcantharidin and LB-100 have broadened therapeutic horizons, the latter reaching clinical trials as a novel anticancer agent and immune checkpoint potentiator. Despite inconsistencies in the literature, ranging from pharmacological selectivity to reproducibility of assay data, recent advances in structural biology, computational modeling, and medicinal chemistry have opened new opportunities to refine potency, selectivity, and stability of cantharidin-derived therapeutic molecules. This review critically examines the historical, chemical, and biomedical landscape of cantharidin and its derivatives, clarifies longstanding ambiguities, and highlights future opportunities to develop phosphatase-targeting therapies for cancer, autoimmune, and inflammatory disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.