Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502814›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2026

Advance Care Planning in Dialysis Patients With a Conversation Game.

Anne Dufey Teso, Gora Da Rocha Rodrigues, Catherine Bollondi Pauly, Pascale Lefuel, Monica Escher, Christine Clavien

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne Dufey TesoDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gora Da Rocha RodriguesHESAV School of Health Sciences - Vaud, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Catherine Bollondi PaulyDivision of Professional Practices, Care Directorate, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pascale LefuelDivision of Professional Practices, Care Directorate, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Monica EscherDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals; Unit for Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christine ClavienInstitute for Ethics History and the Humanities, Faculty of Medecine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To support advance care planning (ACP), a conversation game, Methods: Dialysis nurses received a 10-hour training in ACP and use of the card game Results: Twelve nurses conducted ACP interventions. Thirty-three patients (87% of eligible patients) accepted to be included, 25 (75%) started the ACP intervention, 23 completed it, and 18 answered all questionnaires. 5 withdrawals were due to premature death. Nurses and patients rated the training, the intervention and the card game as good and highly acceptable: mean scores ranged from 2.87 to 4.17 on a 5-point Likert scale questions. Organizational difficulties were reported by nurses. Significant increases were observed on uploaded ADs (+ 30%), designated health care surrogates (+ 80%), patients reporting end-of-life planning actions (12/19), patients' engagement in ACP (+ 1.04 on 1-5 scale, Conclusion: The 3-step ACP intervention using

Indexed as

advance care planningcommunicationconversation gamedocumentationpatients’ valuesshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID41502814
PMCPMC12769139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.