ArticleArthroplasty today2026
Intraoperative Wound Irrigation in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Survey of Current Understanding and Practice Across the United States.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevention and Treatment of Surgical Site Infections in Orthopaedic Surgery: An Italian Delphi Consensus on Risk Stratification and Wound Irrigation Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Periprosthetic joint infections remain a serious complication following arthroplasty surgery, causing significant patient morbidity and economic burden to health-care systems. While surgical site infection (SSI) preventive measures have shown effectiveness, there remains a significant gap in literature regarding surgeon intraoperative practice, such as the use of intraoperative wound irrigation (IOWI). While studies highlight the potential in reducing SSIs, variability in clinical application and the lack of standardized, evidence-based guidelines necessitate a comprehensive understanding of current practices. Methods: A 46-question survey was developed following literature review and validation with high-volume primary and revision arthroplasty surgeons. Deployed via online clinician engagement platform, the survey queried challenges of SSI in relation to IOWI, current IOWI practice, the role of biofilm in periprosthetic joint infections, and ideal properties of irrigation solutions. Results: A total of 112 orthopaedic surgeons across the United States participated in the survey. Respondents indicated a high level of knowledge regarding the role of IOWI in SSI treatment and prevention. Key attributes of an ideal IOWI varied depending on procedural step (exposure, instrumentation, implantation, and closure) and procedure type (primary or revision). Variation in IOWI practice was evident in irrigant selection and decision rationale, with relatively lower alignment to contact time and residual antimicrobial activity. Conclusions: This survey highlights the perception that IOWI is an important part of routine SSI reduction measures and suggests variation in practice interventions and solution preference. Our findings support the necessity for a rigorous, evidence-based consensus via expert guidance to address the key surgical challenges to improve consistency of IOWI solution utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.