Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502780›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T air2025

Implications of printing ink composition for ambient air pollutants.

Joseph M Martin, Xiaoyu Liu, Ingrid J George, Karl M Seltzer, Hannah S Halliday, Michael D Hays, Havala O T Pye

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T air, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph M MartinOffice of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Xiaoyu LiuOffice of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Ingrid J GeorgeOffice of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Karl M SeltzerOffice of Air and Radiation, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Hannah S HallidayOffice of Air and Radiation, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Michael D HaysOffice of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Havala O T PyeOffice of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emissions from volatile chemical products (VCPs) have become increasingly important to anthropogenic organic carbon emissions, and consequently to anthropogenic ozone and secondary organic aerosol (SOA), as emission control strategies have reduced contributions from combustion sources. Industrial and consumer printing inks contribute considerably to VCP emissions, yet emission speciation profiles for printing inks are outdated and ignore the increasing market share of water-based inks. This study develops organic compound emissions profiles for one organic solvent-based industrial ink and two water-based consumer inks using microchamber emissions tests. The composition of the solvent-based ink differed from the declared composition. Emissions profiles were applied to estimates of SOA and O

Indexed as

Chamber emission testConsumer productsEmission factorozoneSecondary organic aerosolVolatile chemical products

Identifiers

PMID41502780
PMCPMC12774387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.