Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502720›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Can Prions Carry Biological Information?

Kariem Ezzat, Alberto J Espay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kariem EzzatJames J. and Joan A. Gardner Family Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0525, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4186-0675
Alberto J EspayJames J. and Joan A. Gardner Family Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0525, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of the structure of DNA and the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of replication, transcription, and translation are the foundations of modern biology and medicine. However, in the early 80s, the prion hypothesis introduced a new system of biological information transfer that does not rely on DNA; it introduced the concept of conformational propagation through templating. Unlike the molecular biology revolution, which was based on detailed molecular structures and mechanisms, the prion hypothesis was postulated in the absence of clear molecular structures or mechanisms. In this Viewpoint, we highlight 10 points in which the prion hypothesis contradicts the molecular, structural, and mechanistic experimental evidence accrued since its inception four decades ago. Alternatively, we postulate that an extension of the thermodynamic hypothesis of protein folding (Anfinsen's dogma) to the state of proteins at high concentration (supersaturation) is better suited for explaining the different facets and pathways of protein aggregation.

Identifiers

PMID41502720
PMCPMC12771219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.