ArticleACS omega2025
Restoration of Cambrian Paleogeomorphology and Its Geological Significance in the Tabei Area, Tarim Basin.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Cambrian System in the Tabei area underwent multiple phases of tectonic movement. The paleostructures have been significantly reconstructed, which makes geomorphological restoration very difficult. Previous studies in this area have mostly focused on traditional, single technical methods, resulting in limitations in the characterization of complex paleogeomorphology. For this reason, this paper proposes a new paleogeomorphology restoration method based on combining the shoreline trajectory method with the stratigraphic thickness method. First, the denudation volume at the end of the Late Cambrian sedimentation is calculated using the layer flattening method and the impression method, constrained by the double-sided restoration method. Then, on this basis, the tectonic uplift of the Xiaoerbulake sedimentary period is restored using the stratum thickness method. Finally, the relationship between accommodation space and sediment supply rate is used to derive the law of shoreline migration. Shoreline migration indicates the direction of tectonic movement and identifies the period of tectonic uplift during the Xiaoerbulake sedimentary period. The results indicate that the Xiaoerbulake Formation's sedimentary period in the early Cambrian was the main uplift period. The amount of tectonic uplift increased in a northeasterly direction, with the maximum located in the northern part of the Yuqi-6 Well. This controls the direction in which the Xiaoerbulake sediments prograde and the formation of the platform-margin. The Xiaoerbulake sedimentary period experienced two phases of uplift and three sedimentary stages, causing the northern sedimentary line to move eastward.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.