Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502648›Full record

ReviewACS omega2025

Nanofertilizers in Modern Agriculture: A Technological Revolution in Plant Nutrition and Resource Efficiency.

Moacir C do Couto Junior, Leandro I da Silva, Mariana de S Ribeiro, Caroline Dambroz, Tatiana C E Bufalo, Marcelo Pedrosa Gomes, Joyce Dória

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Moacir C do Couto JuniorDepartment of Agriculture, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras 37203-202, Brazil.
Leandro I da SilvaDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras 37203-202, Brazil.
Mariana de S RibeiroDepartment of Agriculture, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras 37203-202, Brazil.
Caroline DambrozDepartment of Agriculture, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras 37203-202, Brazil.
Tatiana C E BufaloDepartment of Physics, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras 37203-202, Brazil.
Marcelo Pedrosa GomesDepartment of Botany, Biological Sciences Sector, Federal University of Paraná, Avenida Coronel Francisco H. dos Santos, 100, Polytechnic Center Jardim das Américas, 81531-980 Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9406-9815
Joyce DóriaDepartment of Agriculture, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras 37203-202, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7727-5016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture as we know it today has been made possible by the modernization of management practices and technological advances in agricultural inputs. However, the excessive, continuous, and inappropriate use of these inputs has led to nutrient loss, negatively affecting the ecosystem and human health. Population growth and climate change have driven the search for alternative technologies that increase crop productivity and reduce environmental impacts. Nanotechnology has emerged as a promising tool in agriculture, promoting better nutrient supply, controlled fertilizer release, and greater application and absorption efficiency. Nanofertilizers contribute to increasing crop yields, reducing nutrient losses, and promoting sustainability. This review aims to explore the current literature on nanofertilizers, their properties, synthesis methods, absorption and transport mechanisms, and the interaction between soil and microbiota. It provides an assessment of their agronomic benefits and potential environmental risks. In addition, we present a bibliometric analysis that identifies global trends in the scientific literature focused on nanofertilizers. This study highlights recent advancements and the existing perspective on nanofertilizers while emphasizing the need for regulatory frameworks and long-term field evaluations to ensure their safe and effective implementation in agriculture.

Identifiers

PMID41502648
PMCPMC12771263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.