Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502616›Full record

ReviewACS omega2025

Silicon Carbide-Based Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Green View.

Ana Isabela Pianowski Salussoglia, João Paulo de Mesquita, Marcio Cesar Pereira, Rafael Vicentini, Gustavo Doubek, Hudson Zanin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Isabela Pianowski SalussogliaAdvanced Energy Storage Division, Center for Innovation on New Energies, University of Campinas, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer, Campinas, São Paulo 13083-852, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0936-1449
João Paulo de MesquitaDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys, Diamantina, Minas Gerais 39100-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7089-1246
Marcio Cesar PereiraInstitute of Science, Engineering, and Technology (ICET), Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys (UFVJM), Campus Mucuri, Teófilo Otoni, Minas Gerais 39803-371, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9143-782X
Rafael VicentiniAdvanced Energy Storage Division, Center for Innovation on New Energies, University of Campinas, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer, Campinas, São Paulo 13083-852, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6906-8669
Gustavo DoubekAdvanced Energy Storage Division, Center for Innovation on New Energies, University of Campinas, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer, Campinas, São Paulo 13083-852, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9349-4801
Hudson ZaninAdvanced Energy Storage Division, Center for Innovation on New Energies, University of Campinas, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer, Campinas, São Paulo 13083-852, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7295-4378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silicon carbide (SiC) has evolved from an inert structure to a potential candidate for lithium storage, offering an attractive alternative to graphite and silicon anodes. This review unifies experimental insights and theoretical predictions to elucidate the mechanisms that govern lithiation, conversion, alloying, and interfacial storage while clarifying the roles of polytype, nanostructure, and defect chemistry. Emphasis is placed on sustainable synthesis routes that valorize biomass and industrial residues, alongside aqueous and bioderived binders that couple interfacial stability with green processing. By benchmarking bare SiC and heterostructured composites against state-of-the-art anodes, we expose unresolved controversies, highlight design principles for nanoscale activation, and identify pathways toward scalable low-carbon fabrication. This review establishes SiC as more than a mechanistic curiosity, positioning it as a viable and sustainable anode candidate, and provides a critical roadmap for accelerating the rational design of next-generation lithium-ion batteries.

Identifiers

PMID41502616
PMCPMC12771176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.