ReviewACS omega2025
Silicon Carbide-Based Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Green View.
Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silicon carbide (SiC) has evolved from an inert structure to a potential candidate for lithium storage, offering an attractive alternative to graphite and silicon anodes. This review unifies experimental insights and theoretical predictions to elucidate the mechanisms that govern lithiation, conversion, alloying, and interfacial storage while clarifying the roles of polytype, nanostructure, and defect chemistry. Emphasis is placed on sustainable synthesis routes that valorize biomass and industrial residues, alongside aqueous and bioderived binders that couple interfacial stability with green processing. By benchmarking bare SiC and heterostructured composites against state-of-the-art anodes, we expose unresolved controversies, highlight design principles for nanoscale activation, and identify pathways toward scalable low-carbon fabrication. This review establishes SiC as more than a mechanistic curiosity, positioning it as a viable and sustainable anode candidate, and provides a critical roadmap for accelerating the rational design of next-generation lithium-ion batteries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.