Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502607›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of coal science & technology2026

Toxicity of respirable coal dust: An overview of origin, chemistry, mechanisms, and possible remedies.

Amir Eskanlou, Barbara J Arnold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of coal science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amir EskanlouJohn and Willie Leone Family Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering, College of Earth and Mineral Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 USA.
Barbara J ArnoldJohn and Willie Leone Family Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering, College of Earth and Mineral Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3013-8081

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of coal workers' pneumoconiosis (CWP) has been on the rise among U.S. coal miners since the early 2000s and is most pronounced in central Appalachia. Such adverse effects on human health are partly linked to the toxicity of respirable coal mine dust particles. In this review, we present an overview of the characteristics and health effects of the coal dust components, as well as the origin, chemistry, and mechanisms for their potential toxicity. Toxicity of coal mine dust is linked to the surface chemistry and bioactivity of the composing particles, such as coal, crystalline silica (quartz), pyrite, and sometimes diesel particulate matter. Formation of reactive oxygen species, such as •OH on the surface of these particles, contributes to the toxicity of coal dust. Various mechanisms including the metal-micelle coating, polymer-coating, chelation of the surface metal ions, and surface silanization, have been proposed in previous studies for the reduction or inhibition of the toxicity of coal dust particles. However, due to the complexity in surface chemistry of the various minerals and coal, there is no single universal detoxification mechanism for coal dust. One feasible remedy to address the proposed mechanisms of toxicity is the use of chemical additives as wetting agents. Important considerations for this approach include particle size and aging, mineralogy, morphology, chemical composition, solubility, surface charge, and synergistic effects of the composing phases. Additional factors to consider are the solution quality and composition, coal rank, and the potential hazards and costs associated with the chosen chemical agents.

Indexed as

ClayCoalPyriteQuartzRespirable dustToxicity

Identifiers

PMID41502607
PMCPMC12769589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.