ArticleGland surgery2025
Comparative outcomes of prepectoral
Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic-assisted versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: current evidence, technical considerations, and clinical outcomes.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Global evolution, intellectual structure, and emerging themes in robot-assisted breast oncologic surgery and cancer-related reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Revisiting Total Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction: Technical Refinements for Improved Outcomes.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted surgical techniques are increasingly adopted in breast reconstruction, yet the optimal implant placement approach remains debated. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (RANSM) with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction using the Da Vinci system has shown improved cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction. While prepectoral reconstruction offers easier implant placement and fewer complications, subpectoral reconstruction provides better upper pole contours and reduced acellular dermal matrix (ADM) requirements. This study compared surgical and esthetic outcomes between prepectoral and subpectoral approaches in robot-assisted immediate prosthetic reconstruction. Methods: This single-institute retrospective analysis included patients with breast cancer who underwent RANSM with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction between October 2021 and May 2024. Seventeen breasts from 10 patients (five prepectoral and five subpectoral cases) were analyzed. Surgical metrics, including operation time, console time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications, were assessed. Seven independent plastic surgeons graded 1-year postoperative esthetic outcomes using the Harvard/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project scale. Results: The prepectoral group demonstrated significantly better esthetic outcomes (mean score, 2.42) than those of the subpectoral group (mean score, 3.65; P=0.04). Complication rates were similar between groups, with animation deformities occurring exclusively in the subpectoral group. Subpectoral reconstruction required additional ADM in patients with curved thoracic contours due to muscle injuries. Conclusions: In conclusion, prepectoral reconstruction provides superior esthetics outcomes and eliminates animation deformity, while subpectoral reconstruction may offer enhanced upper pole support. Both methods offer distinct benefits, with patient-specific factors being crucial for optimal approach selection. Larger studies are needed to refine patient selection and outcomes in robot-assisted reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.