Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502597›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2025

The profunda artery perforator flap in autologous breast reconstruction: a scientific review.

Kevin M McGarry, Jenny Chen, Rebecca L DeSanti, Jonas A Nelson, Robert J Allen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kevin M McGarryPlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jenny ChenPlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Rebecca L DeSantiPlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jonas A NelsonPlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Robert J AllenPlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In oncologic breast reconstruction, autologous techniques have been demonstrated to provide patients with improved long-term outcomes and fewer complications than implant-based techniques, especially in the setting of adjunct therapies. While the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap remains the gold standard, not all patients are suitable candidates due to insufficient abdominal tissue or prior abdominal surgeries. Recent advances in microsurgical and imaging techniques, such as computed tomography angiography (CTA) for perforator mapping, have provided reconstructive surgeons with the ability to reliably harvest perforator-based flaps from various areas of the body that minimize donor site morbidity while maximizing reconstructive success. The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has emerged as a useful tool in the reconstructive microsurgeon's armamentarium for breast reconstruction in patients where more traditional donor sites are inappropriate or unavailable. Harvested from the posteromedial thigh, this fasciocutaneous flap preserves underlying muscle function and offers distinct advantages, including a reliable vascular pedicle and a discreetly hidden scar. This review article outlines the development of the flap, recent modifications, and relevant surgical anatomy, ultimately synthesizing current clinical outcomes to validate the PAP flap as a robust and aesthetically superior alternative for restoring natural breast contour.

Indexed as

autologous breast reconstructionmicrosurgeryProfunda artery perforator flap (PAP flap)

Identifiers

PMID41502597
PMCPMC12771199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.