ArticleBMJ nutrition, prevention & health2025
Relationships of motivation, self-efficacy and social support with healthy eating behaviours among adolescents.
Article in BMJ nutrition, prevention & health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04213014 (Guys/Girls Opt for Activities for Life Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Guys/Girls Opt for Activities for Life Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Psychosocial factors contributing to the continued failure of adolescents to follow the Methods: A secondary analysis of baseline data from a randomised controlled trial was conducted. A total of 935 5th-8th graders, aged 10-14 years, were enrolled. Generalised linear models and structural equation models examined relationships of motivation, social support and self-efficacy for healthy eating with healthy eating behaviours. Results: In this sample (51% female, mean age=12.08±0.99), 48.24% were black/African American, and 48.2% were overweight/obese. In generalised linear models, family social support was significantly associated with HEI fruit (β=0.16, p=0.02) and higher caloric intake (β=44.09, p=0.03). Additionally, friend social support was significantly associated with HEI sodium (lower sodium intake; β=0.23, p=0.01). Structural equation models showed that through motivation, social support indirectly improved HEI total (β=0.09, p=0.006) and whole fruit intake (β=0.07, p=0.04) and increased HEI added sugar (lower added sugar intake; β=0.07, p=0.04). Through self-efficacy, social support was indirectly associated with lower HEI sodium (higher sodium intake; β=-0.04, p=0.04). Discussion: These findings add to the growing body of research on adolescent nutrition by emphasising the complex interplay of psychosocial factors in shaping specific dietary behaviours. Trial registration number: NCT04213014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.