ArticleJAMIA open2026
Leveraging generative AI to enhance Synthea model development.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardizing Disaster Health Data Visualization Using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources in Indonesia: Dashboard Development and Technical Evaluation.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- The Cardiologist Driving Synthetic AI: The TIMA Method for Clinically Supervised Synthetic Data Generation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the use of large language models (LLMs) to assist in developing new agent-based disease-specific patient journey models. Materials and Methods: We focus on Synthea, an open-source synthetic health data generator, with the goal of developing models in less time and with reduced expertise, expanding model diversity, and improving synthetic patient data quality. We apply a 4-stage methodology: (1) using an LLM to extract disease information from authoritative medical sources, (2) using an LLM to create an initial Synthea-compatible model, (3) validating that model through 2-level assessment (structural/syntax validation and requirements satisfaction), and (4) using an LLM to iteratively refine the model based on validation feedback. Results: Using hyperthyroidism as an example, we tested Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, and Gemini 1.5 Pro. While the LLMs generated initial models that varied widely in quality, all 3 demonstrated significant improvement in requirement fulfillment scores through successive iterations, with final requirement fulfilment scores approaching 100% for Claude and Gemini. However, evaluation by human experts revealed various structural deficits in final models. Discussion: LLMs can assist in creating patient journey models when combined with structured methodology and authoritative medical knowledge sources. Iterative improvement was shown to be essential in creating models meeting stated requirements. Limitations include frequent medical code inaccuracies, model isolation without comorbidity considerations, and remaining requirements for clinical expertise and human oversight. Conclusion: LLMs can serve as valuable assistive tools for synthetic health data model development when used within structured, iterative frameworks, although at the time of this writing (mid-2024) LLMs require continued human expertise and validation rather than fully autonomous operation. In principle, this conclusion is not limited to Synthea and could be applied to other agent-oriented patient journey frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.