Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502534›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2026

Developing updated and new guidance to promote reliable patient identification.

Emma Weatherford, Anne Grauer, Carina Sirochinsky, I-Fong Lehman, Neha Thummala, Miriam Callahan, Dean F Sittig, Hardeep Singh, Hojjat Salmasian, Madison Jurgens and 1 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emma WeatherfordVagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8986-0362
Anne GrauerDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Carina SirochinskyVagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
I-Fong LehmanCenter for Patient Safety Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Neha ThummalaCenter for Patient Safety Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Miriam CallahanCenter for Patient Safety Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Dean F SittigDepartment of Clinical and Health Informatics, McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5811-8915
Hardeep SinghCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4419-8974
Hojjat SalmasianDivision of General Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Madison JurgensAugustus C. Long Health Sciences Library, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Jason S AdelmanDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7497-257X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the process of updating the Patient Identification Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience (SAFER) Guide and to review new practices and refinements to the Guide. Materials and Methods: We conducted a review of literature on the topic of patient identification in healthcare settings, focusing on papers published after 2016. Titles and abstracts were screened by a team of reviewers, and the full text of retained articles was used to inform the revision. Results: The updated SAFER Guide strengthens recommendations for displaying patient photographs and using electronic patient identification, including barcoding and radiofrequency identification on patient wristbands. The Guide also recommends the use of biometric identification at registration and point of care. Finally, the updated Guide removes a recommendation to restrict the number of concurrently open patient records permitted in the electronic health record. Discussion: The revised SAFER Guide includes new recommendations aimed at supporting accurate patient identification at registration, order placement, and the point of care. Conclusion: The updated Patient Identification SAFER Guide provides evidence-based national recommendations to help reduce patient misidentification.

Indexed as

biometric identificationelectronic health recordspatient identification systemspatient safetywrong-patient error

Identifiers

PMID41502534
PMCPMC12772641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.