ArticleJAMIA open2026
Developing updated and new guidance to promote reliable patient identification.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the process of updating the Patient Identification Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience (SAFER) Guide and to review new practices and refinements to the Guide. Materials and Methods: We conducted a review of literature on the topic of patient identification in healthcare settings, focusing on papers published after 2016. Titles and abstracts were screened by a team of reviewers, and the full text of retained articles was used to inform the revision. Results: The updated SAFER Guide strengthens recommendations for displaying patient photographs and using electronic patient identification, including barcoding and radiofrequency identification on patient wristbands. The Guide also recommends the use of biometric identification at registration and point of care. Finally, the updated Guide removes a recommendation to restrict the number of concurrently open patient records permitted in the electronic health record. Discussion: The revised SAFER Guide includes new recommendations aimed at supporting accurate patient identification at registration, order placement, and the point of care. Conclusion: The updated Patient Identification SAFER Guide provides evidence-based national recommendations to help reduce patient misidentification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.