Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502500›Full record

ReviewFood chemistry: X2026

Advances in mead production and flavor characteristics: traditional and modern techniques, metabolic pathways of volatile compounds, and sensory evaluation.

Xian Li, Xiao Tan, Wenlin Sun, Wei Cao, Binglin Li, Jiao Jiang, Yi Qin, Yanlin Liu, Yuyang Song

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xian LiCollege of Enology, Northwest A&F University, 22 Xinong Road, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China.
Xiao TanCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.
Wenlin SunCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.
Wei CaoCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.
Binglin LiCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.
Jiao JiangCollege of Enology, Northwest A&F University, 22 Xinong Road, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China.
Yi QinCollege of Enology, Northwest A&F University, 22 Xinong Road, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China.
Yanlin LiuCollege of Enology, Northwest A&F University, 22 Xinong Road, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China.
Yuyang SongCollege of Enology, Northwest A&F University, 22 Xinong Road, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mead, a historically significant fermented beverage, is experiencing renewed interest due to its distinctive sensory properties and potential health benefits. Despite this resurgence, substantial challenges persist in production optimization and flavor mechanism elucidation. This review systematically examines advances in mead production, emphasizing the systematic integration of traditional practices with modern biotechnological approaches. Critical research gaps are identified: the absence of standardized fermentation parameters (temperature, microbial consortia, aging conditions) and limited understanding of microbial conversion pathways for honey components, particularly non-Saccharomyces yeasts. Current research has characterized approximately 450 volatile compounds, with esters and terpenoids identified as crucial to the sensory profile. Nevertheless, sensory evaluation methodologies remain hampered by inconsistencies, subjectivity, and the lack of quantitative models correlating volatile compounds with sensory attributes. This review proposes future research priorities including process optimization, metabolic pathway elucidation, and standardization of sensory evaluation through multi-omics methodologies to advance production and quality control.

Indexed as

Acetoin (PubChem CID: 6560)Benzaldehyde (PubChem CID: 240)Ethyl caproate (PubChem CID: 8190)Formation mechanismIsoamyl alcohol (PubChem CID: 6568)Linalool (PubChem CID: 6549)MeadOctanoic acid (PubChem CID: 8891)p-Coumaric acid (PubChem CID: 637542)Pentadecane (PubChem CID: 11400).Phenylethyl alcohol (PubChem CID: 6054)Processing technologyQuality controlSensory characteristicsStyrene (PubChem CID: 7501)Volatile compounds

Identifiers

PMID41502500
PMCPMC12768932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.