ReviewFood chemistry: X2026
Advances in mead production and flavor characteristics: traditional and modern techniques, metabolic pathways of volatile compounds, and sensory evaluation.
Review in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Hibiscus sabdariffa Incorporation on Physicochemical Properties, Color Attributes, and Antioxidant Activity of Mead.Journal of food science · 2026Article
- Stage-Associated Physicochemical and Chemical Profiles of a Single Production Run ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Genome-Based Evaluation of Safety and Probiotic Traits in Infant Feces-SourcedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mead, a historically significant fermented beverage, is experiencing renewed interest due to its distinctive sensory properties and potential health benefits. Despite this resurgence, substantial challenges persist in production optimization and flavor mechanism elucidation. This review systematically examines advances in mead production, emphasizing the systematic integration of traditional practices with modern biotechnological approaches. Critical research gaps are identified: the absence of standardized fermentation parameters (temperature, microbial consortia, aging conditions) and limited understanding of microbial conversion pathways for honey components, particularly non-Saccharomyces yeasts. Current research has characterized approximately 450 volatile compounds, with esters and terpenoids identified as crucial to the sensory profile. Nevertheless, sensory evaluation methodologies remain hampered by inconsistencies, subjectivity, and the lack of quantitative models correlating volatile compounds with sensory attributes. This review proposes future research priorities including process optimization, metabolic pathway elucidation, and standardization of sensory evaluation through multi-omics methodologies to advance production and quality control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.