ArticleClinical kidney journal2026
Prognostic relevance of persistent haematuria in patients with lupus nephritis.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kidney Biopsy and Prognosis in Lupus Nephritis: Histological Predictors of Renal Outcome-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Factors associated with renal relapse in lupus nephritis after remission: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Microscopic haematuria is a risk factor for acute kidney injury in minimal change disease.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the significance of persistent haematuria in lupus nephritis (LN). Methods: A total of 178 patients with LN were enrolled and regularly followed up from December 2016 to September 2022. Follow-up duration was from LN diagnosis to the patient's latest visit or terminated at the onset of endpoint events if they occurred. Their clinical and laboratory data as well as outcomes were monitored and analysed from the enrolment point until the final visit. Results: A total of 138 of 178 (77.5%) patients with LN presented with haematuria at the initial diagnosis. During follow-up, 34 patients (19.1%) had no haematuria, 72 (40.4%) patients initially diagnosed but later resolved and 66 (37.1%) exhibited persistent haematuria. Furthermore, patients with persistent haematuria showed higher Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index scores (12.3 ± 2.9 versus 10.7 ± 3.6; Conclusions: Almost 37.1% of patients exhibited persistent haematuria in LN. Furthermore, persistent haematuria independently predicted adverse outcomes, with significantly higher risks for all-cause mortality and progression to renal replacement therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.